Skip to content
EQUAL STANDARDONE STANDARD. FOR EVERYONE.

Statistics observatory · Workplace fatalities

Are men really more than nine in ten workplace deaths, even allowing for hours worked?

Yes. Men are about 92% of US workplace deaths and about 94% of accepted work-related deaths in Canada. Allowing for hours worked barely changes the picture: per hour, men in the US die at about eight times the rate of women.

Draft explainer awaiting editorial review. Figures are taken directly from the sources listed below.

The claim

“More than nine in ten people killed at work are men.”

Verdict

  • Supported

    In both countries, using the official counts. In the US it also holds per hour worked.

  • Not established

    Why. These figures do not show how much is explained by occupation, industry, specific tasks or other factors.

A verdict is about the claim, never about the people who make it.

Share of deaths, injuries and hours worked

Each pair adds to about 100%. Deaths are far more concentrated among men than either injuries or hours worked.

  • US workplace deaths, 2023

    Women
    8.5%
    Men
    91.5%

    447 women and 4,832 men of 5,283 fatal work injuries (a few of unknown sex).

  • Canada accepted work-related deaths, 2024

    Women
    5.3%
    Men
    94.4%

    55 women and 987 men of 1,046 deaths accepted for compensation, including occupational disease (4 unknown).

  • Canada accepted lost-time injury claims, 2024

    Women
    46.2%
    Men
    53.6%

    158,214 women and 183,692 men of 342,714 accepted claims (808 unknown).

  • US hours worked, 2023

    Women
    44.0%
    Men
    56.0%

    131.5 and 167.2 billion hours, the denominators BLS uses for its rates.

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada.

US fatal work injury rate, 2023

Deaths per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers, calculated from hours worked. All workers: 3.5.

  • Fatal injuries per 100,000 FTE

    Women
    0.7
    Men
    5.7

    Hours-based rates, civilian workers.

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

What the numbers measure

In the United States, the Bureau of Labor Statistics counts every fatal work injury it can verify from multiple sources. In 2023 there were 5,283: 4,832 men and 447 women, so women were 8.5%. The count covers injuries, not deaths from long-term occupational disease.

In Canada, the Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards reports deaths accepted for compensation by provincial and territorial boards. In 2024 there were 1,046: 987 men, 55 women and 4 of unknown gender. These include deaths from occupational disease, such as illness from exposures years earlier, and only cover workers insured by a compensation board.

Does it hold once hours worked are taken into account?

Men work more paid hours in total, so some difference in deaths would be expected even if every job were equally dangerous. BLS publishes rates based on hours worked. In 2023 men worked 56% of all hours, but the fatal injury rate was 5.7 per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers for men and 0.7 for women, about eight times higher.

So hours worked explain very little of the difference. Canada does not publish an equivalent rate by gender, so this adjustment can only be shown with US data.

Deaths are not the same as injuries

Non-fatal injuries are much more evenly split. In Canada in 2024, men made up about 54% of accepted lost-time injury claims, compared with about 94% of accepted deaths. The large gap appears in the most severe outcomes, not in injury overall.

What is supported, and what is not established

Supported: men account for more than nine in ten workplace deaths in both countries, and in the US the gap remains large per hour worked.

Not established by these figures: the reasons. The obvious candidates are differences in occupation and industry, such as construction, transportation and resource extraction, and in the tasks done within an occupation. The count tables alone cannot say how much each contributes, or whether factors such as risk-taking norms, training or enforcement play a part.

Canada and the United States are not directly comparable

The US figure counts injury deaths in the year they happen. The Canadian figure counts compensated deaths, including occupational disease, in the year the claim is accepted, and leaves out workers not covered by a board, such as many self-employed people. The direction is the same in both, but the totals and shares are built differently.

Limitations and open questions

The next step is rates by sex within the same occupation and industry, which would show how much of the gap is about which jobs men and women do. Where the data allow it, a future version of this explainer will add them.

Small counts are suppressed in the Canadian tables, and gender is occasionally unknown in both countries.

Calculation notes

  • Shares are calculated from the published counts and include people of unknown sex or gender in the total, so pairs may not add to exactly 100%.
  • BLS rates are deaths per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers, where one full-time equivalent is 2,000 hours a year, as published.
  • Hours shares: 167.2 ÷ 298.7 billion hours for men; 131.5 ÷ 298.7 for women.

Sources

  1. 1.Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2023 (news release USDL-24-2564)(opens in a new tab)U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Accessed October 14, 2026
  2. 2.Hours-based fatal injury rates by selected worker characteristics, 2023 (XLSX)(opens in a new tab)U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Accessed October 14, 2026
  3. 3.National Work Injury, Disease and Fatality Statistics 2022–2024 (Tables 2 and 23)(opens in a new tab)Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada · Accessed October 14, 2026

Spotted an error, or a better source?

Request a correction