Skip to content
EQUAL STANDARDONE STANDARD. FOR EVERYONE.

Statistics observatory · Education

Do women now earn most degrees, and are boys falling behind at school?

Women have earned most US bachelor’s degrees since the early 1980s and earn about 59% in both countries today. At 15, boys trail girls in reading but lead in mathematics, with no gap in science. Men still earn most engineering and computer science degrees.

Draft explainer awaiting editorial review. Figures are taken directly from the sources listed below.

The claim

“Women now earn most university degrees, and boys are falling behind at school.”

Verdict

  • Supported

    Women earn about six in ten bachelor’s degrees in both Canada and the US, and most master’s degrees.

  • Misleading

    As a general statement about school. Boys are well behind in reading, but ahead in mathematics, and level in science.

A verdict is about the claim, never about the people who make it.

Share of degrees awarded, by level

Canada: graduates in 2024. US: degrees conferred in 2021–22, the latest year not projected.

  • Canada, university bachelor’s and other undergraduate degrees

    Women
    58.6%
    Men
    39.7%

    119,034 women and 80,565 men of 203,088 graduates (1.7% gender unknown).

  • Canada, master’s level (second cycle)

    Women
    56.3%
    Men
    41.2%

    All credentials in second-cycle graduate programs.

  • Canada, doctoral level (third cycle)

    Women
    49.8%
    Men
    49.4%

    4,581 women and 4,548 men.

  • US, bachelor’s degrees

    Women
    58.5%
    Men
    41.5%

    1,179,719 women and 835,316 men.

  • US, master’s degrees

    Women
    62.6%
    Men
    37.4%

    551,355 women and 328,894 men.

  • US, doctor’s degrees

    Women
    57.0%
    Men
    43.0%

    Includes professional doctorates such as medicine and law.

Sources: Statistics Canada; U.S. National Center for Education Statistics.

Canada: undergraduate degrees by field, 2024

The overall majority hides large differences between fields.

  • Mathematics, computer and information sciences

    Women
    25.4%
    Men
    73.1%

    13,599 graduates.

  • Architecture, engineering and related technologies

    Women
    26.8%
    Men
    72.1%

    19,647 graduates.

  • Business, management and public administration

    Women
    50.4%
    Men
    48.0%

    36,963 graduates.

  • Social and behavioural sciences and law

    Women
    69.2%
    Men
    29.2%

    45,837 graduates.

  • Health and related fields

    Women
    74.4%
    Men
    23.6%

    28,650 graduates.

  • Education

    Women
    76.1%
    Men
    22.5%

    11,907 graduates.

Sources: Statistics Canada.

Average scores of 15-year-olds, PISA 2022

Bars start at zero, so gaps of 12 to 24 points look small. Within each country every gap shown is statistically significant.

  • Canada, reading

    Women
    519
    Men
    495

    Girls ahead by 24 points, the same as the OECD average gap.

  • Canada, mathematics

    Women
    491
    Men
    503

    Boys ahead by 12 points.

  • US, reading

    Women
    515
    Men
    493

    Girls ahead by 22 points.

  • US, mathematics

    Women
    458
    Men
    471

    Boys ahead by 13 points.

Sources: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada; U.S. National Center for Education Statistics.

What the numbers measure

Degree figures are counts of credentials awarded in a year, as reported by institutions. In Canada in 2024, women received 58.6% of university undergraduate degrees and men 39.7%; the rest were of unknown gender. In the US in 2021–22, women received 58.5% of bachelor’s degrees and 62.6% of master’s degrees.

This is not new. In the US, women first earned more bachelor’s degrees than men in 1981–82, and have earned more in every year the NCES table shows since then.

School performance is measured here by PISA, an international test of 15-year-olds in reading, mathematics and science run every few years by the OECD. It tests a sample of students, so small differences may not be meaningful; the gaps reported here are ones the publishers identify as statistically significant.

Are boys falling behind at school?

In reading, yes. In 2022, girls outscored boys by 24 points in Canada and 22 points in the US. Boys were also more likely to fall below the level PISA treats as a baseline: in Canada, 21.8% of boys compared with 14.4% of girls.

In mathematics, the gap runs the other way. Boys outscored girls by 12 points in Canada and 13 points in the US, and in Canada 15% of boys reached the top two levels compared with 10% of girls. A similar share of girls and boys reached the baseline level in mathematics (78% and 79%).

In science, average scores showed no measurable difference between girls and boys in either country; in Canada both averaged 515. Canadian boys were slightly more likely than girls to score at both the lowest and the highest levels.

Different fields, different gaps

The overall majority of women among graduates hides very different patterns by field. In Canada in 2024, men earned about 73% of undergraduate degrees in mathematics and computer science and 72% in engineering, while women earned about 74% in health and 76% in education. Business was close to even.

What is supported, and what is not established

Supported: women earn most bachelor’s and master’s degrees in both countries, and have earned most US bachelor’s degrees since the early 1980s.

Supported: boys trail girls in reading at age 15, and more boys than girls have weak reading skills.

Misleading: describing this as boys falling behind at school in general. Boys outperform girls in mathematics and match them in science, and men remain the large majority in engineering and computer science degrees.

Not established by these figures: why the gaps exist, or whether schools treat boys and girls differently. These are descriptions of outcomes, not of causes.

Canada and the United States are not directly comparable

PISA uses the same test in both countries, so its scores can be compared, with care. Degree figures cannot: Canada reports graduates by calendar year and program level, while the US reports degrees conferred by academic year, and US doctor’s degrees include professional degrees such as medicine and law.

Limitations and open questions

Degree counts measure credentials, not people. One person can earn more than one in a year, and the figures do not show completion rates or who started a program but did not finish.

Canada’s PISA 2022 results should be read with some caution: the Council of Ministers of Education notes that one or more PISA technical standards were not met for Canada and most provinces. The next PISA results, from the 2025 assessment, will update these figures.

These figures do not cover high school graduation, apprenticeships or college trades programs. A future version may add them.

Calculation notes

  • Canadian shares are calculated from the published counts, with people of unknown gender included in the total, so pairs may not add to 100%. Statistics Canada rounds every count to a multiple of 3.
  • US shares for women are as published by NCES. Men’s shares are 100% minus the women’s share, because the US table has no unknown category.
  • PISA scores and gaps are as published. We have not recalculated them.

Sources

  1. 1.Postsecondary graduates, by field of study, program type, credential type, and gender (Table 37-10-0012-01)(opens in a new tab)Statistics Canada · Accessed October 15, 2026
  2. 2.Digest of Education Statistics, Table 318.10: Degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by level of degree and sex of student(opens in a new tab)U.S. National Center for Education Statistics · Accessed October 15, 2026
  3. 3.Measuring Up: Canadian Results of the OECD PISA 2022 Study (Tables B.1.11, B.3.12a and B.3.13)(opens in a new tab)Council of Ministers of Education, Canada · Accessed October 15, 2026
  4. 4.International Comparisons: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy of 15-Year-Old Students (Condition of Education)(opens in a new tab)U.S. National Center for Education Statistics · Accessed October 15, 2026

Spotted an error, or a better source?

Request a correction